Skip to main content
Sam Jia. 中文

Leader / c. 1162 – 18 or 25 August 1227 (the 1206 title is inside this life)

Genghis Khan

Temüjin, elected khan in 1206, whose death in 1227 is dated and still unexplained.

Updated ·5 min read

Life and beginnings

Genghis Khan was born Temüjin, the eldest child of Yesügei, a Mongol chieftain of the Borjigin clan, and Hö’elün. The biography places the birth about 1162 and records the dispute: 1155, 1162, or 1167. Most historians accept 1162. Paul Ratchnevsky noted that Temüjin himself may not have known the year. When he was eight his father died, and the family was abandoned by its tribe. He later killed his older half-brother Behter. Alliances with Jamukha and Toghrul helped him recover his wife Börte after raiders took her. Around 1187 he was badly defeated. The guide’s phrase “humble origins” is this early poverty, not a second birth story.[1] [3]

In 1206, at a kurultai at the source of the Onon, he formally took the title Genghis Khan. The biography says the meaning is uncertain. Proposals include a word with no inherited office, a word tied to strength, and a link to a Turkic word for ocean that would make the title a claim to universal rule. The assembly is the date the published Mongolia essay already uses for the election. This essay does not replace that date with the disputed birth year.[1]

Defining achievements

After 1206 he reorganized Mongol society into a decimal army, with units of ten, a hundred, and a thousand, and he promoted men who were not old tribal chiefs. The biography calls that a break with clan loyalty. In 1215 his war against the Jin dynasty took the capital Zhongdu. In 1219, after his envoys were executed, he invaded the Khwarazmian Empire. He died on 18 or 25 August 1227 while subduing the Western Xia. The death was kept secret until the city he was besieging fell. The biography lists illness, and also later stories such as an arrow, and it does not choose. He was buried on or near Burkhan Khaldun, on ground that was closed to the public. The guide says the nature of the death remains a mystery. The date and the secrecy are both in the biography. The mystery is the cause, not the year.[1] [3]

The guide’s campaigns are northern China and the eastern Silk Road. Zhongdu in 1215 is the northern Chinese capital in the biography. The Khwarazmian war is farther west than that sentence. A reader who stops at the guide has the steppe union and one direction of conquest. The western campaign, the 1206 title, and the disputed birth are the parts the sentence does not carry.[1] [3]

Legacy and interpretation

The biography calls him generous to followers and ruthless to enemies, and it says he believed the deity Tengri had destined him to rule widely. It also says the army under him killed millions, while the conquests opened exchange across a vast area. Memory splits: a tyrant in some traditions, a national founder in Mongolia, and a western reassessment since the 1990s. The guide’s word for the accomplishments is “inimical.” That adjective is the page’s judgment. It is not a casualty table.[1] [3]

The published Mongolia essay is the empire, including years after this death. The published Dai Viet essay is the kingdom that met Mongol campaigns in 1258, 1285, and 1287–88. Those campaigns begin after 18 or 25 August 1227. This leader is not the Trần war, and the Trần war is not the 1206 assembly. Ögedei acceded in 1229, after a two-year interregnum. The founder and the later khans stay in that order.[1] [2]

A closer look

The ability is Chosen of Tengri. It raises the combat strength of cavalry, raises it further inside a commander’s radius, lets army commanders move at full speed with no packed units, and, once an age, lets a commander permanently convert adjacent independent military units. Tengri, on the biography’s page, is the deity of a claimed destiny. A combat rule is not that belief, and a conversion of independent units is not the decimal reform of 1206. The agenda, Tümen, improves the relationship with the leader who has the fewest cavalry and worsens it with the leader who has the most. In the biography a minqan is a unit of a thousand, and the higher groupings are part of the same reform. A relationship score is not that unit. Yields and the size of the relationship change stay on the guide.[1] [3]

The Chinese page names the ability and the agenda in its own words. The English page calls the content part of the Right to Rule Collection DLC bundle, and its footnote says that owning the bundle or the Founders Edition means the content is already owned. The Chinese footnote says the collection was included in the Founders Edition, which it says is no longer sold, and that the collection can be bought separately if the base game is owned. This essay does not collapse those two footnotes into one shop. There is one leader entry. Temüjin and Genghis Khan are a birth name and a title, not two personas.[3] [4]

In Civilization VII

The English guide names Chosen of Tengri and Tümen. The simplified Chinese guide names the same slots in its own words and titles the page with his Chinese name. Attributes on both pages are expansionist and militaristic. The page adds him as part of the paid Right to Rule Collection. That is a DLC statement. It is not a base-game label. There is no second persona, and the numeric size of the combat bonus is not copied here.[3] [4]

The first step back from the ability is to keep the disputed birth, the title of 1206, Zhongdu in 1215, and the death on 18 or 25 August 1227 apart from the Đại Việt campaigns that the invasion page dates to 1258 and after. The published Mongolia essay is the place to read the empire. The published Dai Viet essay is the place to read the later resistance. Neither page is this grave.[1] [2] [3]

References

  1. Genghis Khan — Wikipedia Accessed: Return to citation 1
  2. Mongol invasions of Vietnam — Wikipedia Accessed: Return to citation 2
  3. Genghis Khan — Official Civilization VII Game Guide Accessed: Return to citation 3
  4. Genghis Khan — Civilization VII Simplified Chinese Game Guide Accessed: Return to citation 4
← Back to the codex